• Home
  • Work
  • Protecting the Return-to-Service Milestone

CASE STUDY 04 • AVIATION

Protecting the Return-to-Service Milestone

Hands-on equipment delivery and site-level coordination that helped two radar installations achieve scheduled return to service under the FAA’s Brand New Air Traffic Control System program.

This case study describes project-management practices at a high level. Site identities, exact schedules, personnel, equipment configurations, and internal project records are omitted.

  • TwoRadar installations
  • Senior Site Technical AdvisorRole
  • On scheduleBoth completed and returned to service

Situation

Program Context

As a Senior Site Technical Advisor with Peraton, I supported two radar installations within the FAA’s Brand New Air Traffic Control System (BNATCS) program. My responsibilities extended beyond reporting and coordination: I played an integral role in equipment acceptance, inventory, and installation, contributing both physically and logistically.

Both installations faced challenges as their expected Return-to-Service dates approached. Material availability, late deliveries, and configuration changes required coordinated action alongside the remaining installation work. My contribution combined hands-on equipment involvement with the follow-through needed to help overcome those obstacles.

Challenge

Delivery Challenges

  • Material availability: Required items were not always available when needed, creating obstacles to completing the remaining work.
  • Delivery uncertainty: Late shipments added pressure as the expected return-to-service dates approached.
  • Technical changes: Changing requirements had to be addressed alongside the work already underway.

Moves

How I Contributed

  • Equipment acceptance and inventory. I played an integral role in accepting and inventorying equipment for the installations, bringing direct involvement with the equipment into my site-level coordination work.
  • Physical and logistical installation. I contributed to the actual installation effort while helping coordinate the logistical work supporting it.
  • Late-stage obstacle resolution. I coordinated responses to material shortages, delivery delays, and changing technical requirements as the scheduled return-to-service milestones approached.
  • Field reporting. I provided daily and weekly reporting to communicate progress and the challenges being addressed.

Outcomes

Scheduled Return to Service

  • Both installations were completed on schedule and returned to service in the FAA’s National Airspace System.

This was a shared accomplishment across the installation teams. My contribution connected equipment acceptance and inventory, hands-on installation, logistics, and site coordination. It demonstrated my ability to work through delivery obstacles while remaining directly engaged in execution.

Lesson

Transferable Pattern

Effective field delivery requires an understanding of both the equipment and the work needed to put it in place. Hands-on involvement gave substance to my coordination responsibilities; consistent follow-through helped me contribute when the final stages became challenging.

Across both installations, I brought technical execution and project-management discipline together in support of the scheduled outcome.

Technical execution and project-management discipline

Hands-on involvement and consistent follow-through in support of the scheduled outcome.